Current File : //var/www/html/shaban/duassis/api/public/storage/q8q7nfc/cache/d8ce2d6162925789523802b7c2024a13
a:5:{s:8:"template";s:7286:"<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
<meta charset="utf-8"/>
<meta content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1" name="viewport"/>
<title>{{ keyword }}</title>
<link href="//fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato%3A300%2C400%7CMerriweather%3A400%2C700&ver=5.4" id="siteorigin-google-web-fonts-css" media="all" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css"/>
<style rel="stylesheet" type="text/css">html{font-family:sans-serif;-webkit-text-size-adjust:100%;-ms-text-size-adjust:100%}body{margin:0}footer,header,nav{display:block}a{background-color:transparent}svg:not(:root){overflow:hidden}button{color:inherit;font:inherit;margin:0}button{overflow:visible}button{text-transform:none}button{-webkit-appearance:button;cursor:pointer}button::-moz-focus-inner{border:0;padding:0}html{font-size:93.75%}body,button{color:#626262;font-family:Merriweather,serif;font-size:15px;font-size:1em;-webkit-font-smoothing:subpixel-antialiased;-moz-osx-font-smoothing:auto;font-weight:400;line-height:1.8666}.site-content{-ms-word-wrap:break-word;word-wrap:break-word}html{box-sizing:border-box}*,:after,:before{box-sizing:inherit}body{background:#fff}ul{margin:0 0 2.25em 2.4em;padding:0}ul li{padding-bottom:.2em}ul{list-style:disc}button{background:#fff;border:2px solid;border-color:#ebebeb;border-radius:0;color:#2d2d2d;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;font-size:13.8656px;font-size:.8666rem;line-height:1;letter-spacing:1.5px;outline-style:none;padding:1em 1.923em;transition:.3s;text-decoration:none;text-transform:uppercase}button:hover{background:#fff;border-color:#24c48a;color:#24c48a}button:active,button:focus{border-color:#24c48a;color:#24c48a}a{color:#24c48a;text-decoration:none}a:focus,a:hover{color:#00a76a}a:active,a:hover{outline:0}.main-navigation{align-items:center;display:flex;line-height:1}.main-navigation:after{clear:both;content:"";display:table}.main-navigation>div{display:inline-block}.main-navigation>div ul{list-style:none;margin:0;padding-left:0}.main-navigation>div li{float:left;padding:0 45px 0 0;position:relative}.main-navigation>div li:last-child{padding-right:0}.main-navigation>div li a{text-transform:uppercase;color:#626262;font-family:Lato,sans-serif;font-size:.8rem;letter-spacing:1px;padding:15px;margin:-15px}.main-navigation>div li:hover>a{color:#2d2d2d}.main-navigation>div a{display:block;text-decoration:none}.main-navigation>div ul{display:none}.menu-toggle{display:block;border:0;background:0 0;line-height:60px;outline:0;padding:0}.menu-toggle .svg-icon-menu{vertical-align:middle;width:22px}.menu-toggle .svg-icon-menu path{fill:#626262}#mobile-navigation{left:0;position:absolute;text-align:left;top:61px;width:100%;z-index:10}.site-content:after:after,.site-content:before:after,.site-footer:after:after,.site-footer:before:after,.site-header:after:after,.site-header:before:after{clear:both;content:"";display:table}.site-content:after,.site-footer:after,.site-header:after{clear:both}.container{margin:0 auto;max-width:1190px;padding:0 25px;position:relative;width:100%}@media (max-width:480px){.container{padding:0 15px}}.site-content:after{clear:both;content:"";display:table}#masthead{border-bottom:1px solid #ebebeb;margin-bottom:80px}.header-design-2 #masthead{border-bottom:none}#masthead .sticky-bar{background:#fff;position:relative;z-index:101}#masthead .sticky-bar:after{clear:both;content:"";display:table}.sticky-menu:not(.sticky-bar-out) #masthead .sticky-bar{position:relative;top:auto}#masthead .top-bar{background:#fff;border-bottom:1px solid #ebebeb;position:relative;z-index:9999}#masthead .top-bar:after{clear:both;content:"";display:table}.header-design-2 #masthead .top-bar{border-top:1px solid #ebebeb}#masthead .top-bar>.container{align-items:center;display:flex;height:60px;justify-content:space-between}#masthead .site-branding{padding:60px 0;text-align:center}#masthead .site-branding a{display:inline-block}#colophon{clear:both;margin-top:80px;width:100%}#colophon .site-info{border-top:1px solid #ebebeb;color:#626262;font-size:13.8656px;font-size:.8666rem;padding:45px 0;text-align:center}@media (max-width:480px){#colophon .site-info{word-break:break-all}}@font-face{font-family:Lato;font-style:normal;font-weight:300;src:local('Lato Light'),local('Lato-Light'),url(http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/lato/v16/S6u9w4BMUTPHh7USSwiPHA.ttf) format('truetype')}@font-face{font-family:Lato;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;src:local('Lato Regular'),local('Lato-Regular'),url(http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/lato/v16/S6uyw4BMUTPHjx4wWw.ttf) format('truetype')}@font-face{font-family:Merriweather;font-style:normal;font-weight:400;src:local('Merriweather Regular'),local('Merriweather-Regular'),url(http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/merriweather/v21/u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZJ.ttf) format('truetype')}@font-face{font-family:Merriweather;font-style:normal;font-weight:700;src:local('Merriweather Bold'),local('Merriweather-Bold'),url(http://fonts.gstatic.com/s/merriweather/v21/u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf_.ttf) format('truetype')} </style>
</head>
<body class="cookies-not-set css3-animations hfeed header-design-2 no-js page-layout-default page-layout-hide-masthead page-layout-hide-footer-widgets sticky-menu sidebar wc-columns-3">
<div class="hfeed site" id="page">
<header class="site-header" id="masthead">
<div class="container">
<div class="site-branding">
<a href="#" rel="home">
{{ keyword }}</a> </div>
</div>
<div class="top-bar sticky-bar sticky-menu">
<div class="container">
<nav class="main-navigation" id="site-navigation" role="navigation">
<button aria-controls="primary-menu" aria-expanded="false" class="menu-toggle" id="mobile-menu-button"> <svg class="svg-icon-menu" height="32" version="1.1" viewbox="0 0 27 32" width="27" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<path d="M27.429 24v2.286q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339h-25.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h25.143q0.464 0 0.804 0.339t0.339 0.804zM27.429 14.857v2.286q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339h-25.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h25.143q0.464 0 0.804 0.339t0.339 0.804zM27.429 5.714v2.286q0 0.464-0.339 0.804t-0.804 0.339h-25.143q-0.464 0-0.804-0.339t-0.339-0.804v-2.286q0-0.464 0.339-0.804t0.804-0.339h25.143q0.464 0 0.804 0.339t0.339 0.804z"></path>
</svg>
</button>
<div class="menu-menu-1-container"><ul class="menu" id="primary-menu"><li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-home menu-item-20" id="menu-item-20"><a href="#">About</a></li>
<li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-165" id="menu-item-165"><a href="#">Blog</a></li>
<li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-24" id="menu-item-24"><a href="#">FAQ</a></li>
<li class="menu-item menu-item-type-post_type menu-item-object-page menu-item-22" id="menu-item-22"><a href="#">Contacts</a></li>
</ul></div> </nav>
<div id="mobile-navigation"></div>
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div class="site-content" id="content">
<div class="container">
{{ text }}
<br>
{{ links }}
</div>
</div>
<footer class="site-footer " id="colophon">
<div class="container">
</div>
<div class="site-info">
<div class="container">
{{ keyword }} 2021</div>
</div>
</footer>
</div>
</body>
</html>";s:4:"text";s:20638:"Diminished Capacity. Study voluntary Manslaughter-Diminished responsibility flashcards from abigail Fairweather's st.robert of newminster class online, or in Brainscape's iPhone or Android app. Intoxication cannot support a defence of diminished responsibility. Despite some recent reforms, there are still criticisms to be made of the current law on murder and voluntary manslaughter. The contemporary partial defence of diminished responsibility only allows a defence under Section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 where it can be shown that the defendant suffered an abnormality of mental functioning which substantially impaired their ability to understand the nature of their conduct, form a rational judgment, and exercise self-control. The gender bias The … Introducing a New Diminished Responsibility Defence for England and Wales Louise Kennefick* A divisive law from the outset, the diminished responsibility defence has con-tinued to arouse criticism since its inception over fifity years ago under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957. PLAY. Punishment justified by its effects. CONTENTS Preface to 2nd Edition ix Acknowledgements xi PART I What is the law? The Homicide Act 1957 contained two partial defences of provocation and diminished responsibility. His trial commenced on 24 October 1983. In relation to acts or omissions on or after 4 October 2010, critical changes to the law of homicide are made by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. This is not the case for diminished responsibility. Automatism is a common law defence available for all crimes. They further interpreted the majority's proposal as inviting abandonment of a formula, in order to free juries in their deliberations, on the issue of responsibility. In U.S. this defense is known as diminished capacity. Criticisms on Liberalism. It is contained in the Homicide Act 1957 as modified by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. 33 By the time of the Royal Commission mid‐century, criticism … The old defence of provocation contained in s3 of the Homicide Act 1957 was based on Devlin J’s dicta in R v Duffy [1949] 1 All E.R. D must prove the defence beyond all reasonable doubt, and must advance medical evidence to support his argument. Khan 2009: D suffered from schizophrenia and killed V but his responsibility for the action was not substantially impaired by the schizophrenia. “Diminished responsibility” is a defence to murder. Consider relevant criticisms of that law, and suggest any reforms that may be appropriate – Model Answer Posted: December 16, 2012 in A2, Diminished Responsibility, Evaluation questions, Exam Support, Loss of Control Diminished responsibility is a complete defence, which D may only argue to murder. The very term ‘Diminished responsibility’ has been criticised by authorities such as the Butler Committee, who say that it is ‘not a medical fact relating to the accused’. defences of diminished responsibility and provocation (later to become loss of control) were introduced in The Homicide Act 1957. diminished responsibility successfully raised in cases of mercy killing. Reform of the law. Article 5(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) protects the right to liberty and security of person. i in t r o d u c t oi n This paper is divided into three parts. Infanticide and diminished responsibility under section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 222 Retaining but reforming the offence of infanticide: minimal, moderate and radical reform options 223 Criticisms of the offence 224 The psychiatric basis of the offence 224 The contemporary partial defence of diminished responsibility only allows a defence under Section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 where it can be shown that the defendant suffered an abnormality of mental functioning which substantially impaired their ability to understand the nature of their conduct, form a rational judgment, and exercise self-control. In some ways loss of control is wider than the defence of provocation. Diminished Responsibilityhas been created from Section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957 and amended through Section 52 of the Corners and Justice Act 2009; where the outcome of a defendant pleading diminished responsibility can have their conviction of Murder reduced to Manslaughter, which is considered as a partial defence towards this particular crime. For example: 1) Many believe that a plea of During this week’s assigned readings in Applied Social Psychology, Understanding and Addressing Social and Practical Problems, by Schneider, Gruman, and Coutts, we learned about the bystander effect.The bystander effect is defined as a phenomenon that occurs when multiple witnesses of an emergency fail to get involved (Schneider, Gruman, & Coutts). Murder, Loss of control and diminished responsibility criticism and reform Essay of 3 pages for the course Criminal Law at University of Westminster Preview 1 out of 3 pages The conditions of s2 Homicide Act 1957 required an abnormality of mind which substantial impaired mental responsibility for the fatal act, as Mackay has observed: “For while provocation requires that loss of self-control be tested in the light of a reasonable person’s Diminished responsibility would recognise a reduced culpability for a range of mental disorders that do not amount to insanity. - Burden of proof should be placed on the defendant. Infanticide: What is meant by Infanticide, The Infanticide Act 1938, Burden of proof on prosecution, Beyond a reasonable doubt, What will be the punishment for a mother convicted of infanticide, Has the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 made any amendment to the law concerning infanticide, Problems with the law of infanticide, Infanticide versus diminished responsibility STUDY. The new defence was based on the recommendations of the Law Commission in 2003 and 2006. For forensic evaluators of adolescents, however, questions of partial responsibility are implicated by the defendant's status as a minor. Introduction. Reforms the law on homicide, in particular on partial defences such as diminished responsibility. The defendant bears the burden of proving on the balance of probabilities that he or she is insane, and, if the test is met, the judge returns a special verdict of “not guilty by reason of insanity”. This is known as . Issues that remain: (2/2) Development Immaturity. For diminished responsibility the burden of proof is on the D. PCC3 2. In R v Kemp [1957] 1 QB 399 arteriosclerosis or a hardening of the arteries caused loss of control during which the defendant attacked his wife with a hammer. He recognised that battered women were likely to display delayed reactions and that, as a rule, the courts should not rule out the defence altogether. Criticisms of the traditional theories. Despite some recent reforms, there are still criticisms to be made of the current law on murder and voluntary manslaughter. Diminished responsibility was, however, accepted as a defence.23 Lord Taylor CJ noted that some allowance should be made to accommodate a lapse of time in cases concerning battered women. Diminished responsibility is one of three special defences which exist solely for the offence of murder. Diminished Responsibility Criticism: NL Criticism: developmental immaturity is not considered, too restrictive for 10-14 ear olds whose frontal lobe has not fully developed. The conditions of s2 Homicide Act 1957 required an abnormality of mind which substantial impaired mental responsibility for the fatal act, as Mackay has observed: “For while provocation requires that loss of self-control be tested in the light of a reasonable person’s The Commission’s Defences to Homicide: Final Report recommended that diminished responsibility should not be introduced in Victoria and that a mental disorder should instead continue to have a mitigating effect that is taken into account in sentencing. concerns definitional issues leading to a lack of clarity and broadening of the defence. CRITICISM. In some ways loss of control is wider than the defence of provocation. S. 52 of Coroners and Justice Act 2009 now amends the old law from s 2 Homicide Act 1957 by, if anything, making it even more wide ranging. to prove . It has most recently been reformed in the Coroners and Justice Act 1957, which updated and clarified the law. The burden of proof is on the defendant to show that is more likely than not that he suffered from such abnormality of the mind that, having unlawfully killed another person, his conviction ought to … was introduced by s2 of the Homicide Act 1957 and amended by s 52 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 which states: Burden and Standard of Proof in Diminished Responsibility. The D must prove the defence upon the balance of probabilities. Tags: criticisms, law03, LAW3, murder, reforms. Liberal economists emphasize the significance of free market and free trade. unjust as a 30 year old could claim it for a lack of developed maturity In the case of provocation, (now ‘loss of control’) the defence only has to raise the issue, and the... Abnormality of mind. This is in light of limited state restrictions and regulations in domestic economy and foreign market (Hall 1998). The defence of non-responsibility, in the US, England and South Africa has traditionally depended upon the youth [1] of an accused, or whether the accused suffers from a so-called pathological mental condition. on balance of probabilities Weaknesses of retributivism. [F1 (1) A person (“D”) who kills or is a party to the killing of another is not to be convicted of murder if D was suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning which— (a) arose from a recognised medical condition, (b) substantially impaired D's ability to do one or more of the things mentioned in subsection (1A), and A number of criticisms have been made of the current law on diminished responsibility. Click here for a summary of criticisms and reform of diminished responsibility and loss of control. Facts: The defendant was drunk when he killed the victim.Medics said that he had a “depressed tried reaction”; in other words, he was depressed following the death of his aunt. Baby Zakari Bennett-Eko died after he was pulled from the River Irwell in Radcliffe, Greater Manchester, by emergency service crews at about 5.15pm on September 11 last year. • The Law Commission recommended in Murder, Manslaughter and Infanticide that diminished responsibility should be modernised to take into account changing medical knowledge. diminished responsibility. Where the defence of diminished responsibility is successfully pleaded, it has the effect of reducing a murder conviction to manslaughter. ... in light of criticisms that the distinction creates uncertainty, complexity, and inconsistency, and that it ultimately fails to reflect with PCC3 1. Evaluations of diminished or partial responsibility are less common but may be addressed in pretrial evaluations of other defenses, such as diminished capacity, or in evaluations pertinent to sentencing. He analyzes how the law would operate under the proposed abolition and under the alternative substitution of diminished responsibility and repudiates the main criticisms of the abolition proposal. defence of diminished responsibility 4.80 72 Acute intoxication 4.87 74 Antisocial personality disorder 4.93 76 What are personality disorders? Criticisms: taken too far and guards had too much power- ... **Diminishes the feelings of responsibility. Pages 380 This preview shows page 165 - 168 out of 380 pages. partial defences: diminished responsibility and loss of control Coroners and Justice Act 2009 ( CJA 2009) if D successfully pleads partial defence he may be found guilty of manslaughter. Di Duca (1959) Court of Appeal held the immediate effects of alcohol or drugs were not sufficient to amount to an injury (medical condition). Unlike other defences, the burden of proof is on the defendant. Defence does not allow for developmental immaturity. In the case of provocation, (now ‘loss of control’) the defence only has to raise the issue, and the prosecution has to disprove it. It may also be difficult to determine whether the defence is of insane or non-insane automatism, which further attenuates the shaky grounds of the insanity defence. The issues are dealt with in part 2 chapter 1. The evaluation either says how the new law improves on the old defence of Provocation, as defined in the Homicide Act 1957, or the potential problems with the new defence of loss of control in The Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Learn faster with spaced repetition. 932: The Law Commission identified several other issues with this law in its report: The objective requirement The first issue was implicit in the case of R v Doughty: that the objective ‘reasonable person’ test under the 1957 Act had become too subjective, enabling a defendant to rely on personal characteristics which made him more short-tempered than other people. The first point to note is that intoxication on its own cannot support a defence of diminished responsibility. General rule. This allows discretion in the sentencing of 'murderers'. Criticisms of the old law: No definition of substantial impairment of mental responsibility; definitions/terminology arguably outdated; expert evidence was critical but the terminology was legal, not scientific; experts expressed concerns about the experience of giving evidence and their own conclusions; unclear why abnormality of the mind had to 'cause' D to kill; 'grossly abused' system … A change to the murder law has come into force, allowing people who faced domestic violence to claim they were forced to … In relation to acts or omissions on or after 4 October 2010, critical changes to the law of homicide are made by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. This is useful evaluation which must be included in your criticisms essays. I recall one case in which eight psychiatrists and psychologists were called to give varying opinions about a person's state of mind. A man who threw his 11-month-old son into a river has been found guilty of manslaughter by diminished responsibility. In Scotland there exists the legal concept that a person who participates in the commission of a crime, irrespective of their role, is equally liable for the outcome of the act. In October 2001 the Commission was asked by the Scottish Ministers to Diminished Responsibility. defence. The CCJA 2009 replaced the defence of provocation, which had received much criticism, with the new defence of loss of control. 1 1 Morality, justice and natural law 3 Morality and law at variance 3 What is justice? Abstract. It applies to any prosecution for a murder occurring before 4 October 2010. Abstract. The defence of diminished responsibility becomes more complicated if the D is also intoxicated at the time of the killing. Abstract. - Potentially break the act of Art 6 (2) of European Convention of Human Rights. Modifications and compromises 4.94 76 Views of other reform bodies and jurisdictions 4.98 78 Discussion 4.102 79 The role of expert witnesses in the determination of whether a condition is a recognised medical condition 4.117 82 128 Even if a sentencing discretion for murder were to be introduced, the defence might still be useful. a diminished responsibility defence is appropriate for New Zealand, this article will consider the origins of the diminished responsibility defence, how the defence operates in otherjurisdictions, and the history of diminished responsibility in New Zealand law. The diminished capacity principle is applicable to those who are mentally ill and unable to understand the consequences of their act at the time of crime. Arguably, the law surrounding voluntary manslaughter was in a state of disarray as a great deal of uncertainty was being produced. The reformed New South Wales defence answers some, but not all, of these criticisms. The main change related to evidence that there has to be an “abnormality of mental function (as opposed to the mind) which must be caused by a “recognised medical condition” (s. 52 (1) (a&b)). it noted that criticisms had been made about insanity and diminished responsibility as part of the criminal law, and it recommended that these topics should be considered by the Scottish Law Commission. In addition, the author recommends substituting a qualified defense of diminished responsibility for the special defense of insanity. 4.94 76 Views of other reform bodies and jurisdictions 4.98 78 Discussion 4.102 79 The role of expert witnesses in the determination of whether a condition is a recognised medical condition 4.117 82 0. Posted: November 22, 2013 in LAW03. Whilst there has been a good deal of qualitative criticism and commentry about the partial defence of diminished responsibility in homicide cases, relatively little empirical analysis has been provided about the way in which the law works. The Law surrounding diminished responsibility changed in October 2010. Diminished responsibility is one of three special defences which exist solely for the offence of murder. justice at last. The CCJA 2009 replaced the defence of provocation, which had received much criticism, with the new defence of loss of control. Conformity. Diminished Responsibility Elements of the offence. justice at last. Section 52 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (the Act) replaces the definition of diminished responsibility in Section 2 of the Homicide Act 1957. Diminished Responsibility occurs when a person commits a unlawful homicide and are suffering from a serious and recognised psychiatric disorder ( with the exception of personality disorder) which is of a temporary nature, but may be one episode in a chronic illness and the offence occurs as a result of this psychiatric disorder .There has to be concomitant serious impairment of cognition and/or judgment … Diminished responsibility becomes more complex if the defendant was intoxicated at the time of the killing. For a jury to consider sexual infidelity in terms of. diminished responsibility can found by a jury following a contested murder trial. diminished responsibility and non-insane automatism. As I discuss in Chapter 5, a broad ranging debate about the M'Naghten Rules took place in England over the last decades of the nineteenth century, and, although this debate encompassed issues such as volitional impairment, punishment versus treatment, and the culpability of insane defendants, some sort of doctrine of diminished responsibility affecting the category of offence and/or sentence was not discussed. 5.38 Diminished responsibility is not a defence in Victorian law. diminished responsibility requires a judgment on issues raising community values, which issues should ordinarily be decided upon by a jury. * Diminished responsibility sentencing R v Rodi [2020] EWCA Crim 330 — Unsuccessful appeal against s45A and 10-year sentence, in which the November 2018 sentencing guidelines for diminished responsibility manslaughter were applied. the prevailing recommendation contemplated responsibility as an ethical question,', and as one which invites only a subjective response. In relation to diminished responsibility, the burden of proof remains on the defence to establish the grounds to the civil standard. Loss of control The most significant changes are, however, in the abolition of the defence of provocation. This is replaced by a new defence entitled, somewhat misleadingly,... Criticisms of the defence of Diminished Responsibility. The main problems with this defence as defined by the Homicide Act 1957 were that: The words of s2 of the Homicide Act were not clear as to what constitute the causes of abnormality of mind. Unlike other defences, the burden of proof is on the defendant. Whilst there has been a good deal of qualitative criticism and commentry about the partial defence of diminished responsibility in homicide cases, relatively little empirical analysis has been provided about the way in which the law works. This was an internal condition and a disease of the mind. Yorkshire Ripper 1980s: parties willing to accept diminished responsibility, courts said no (too much media attention?) Held: The court held that it is possible to use the defence of diminished responsibility even though he was drunk, as long as the media condition was the substantial cause of what he did. The problem of justification. Criticisms of the defence of Diminished Responsibility Burden of proof. His trial commenced on 24 October 1983. Defence law changes for killing after domestic abuse. ";s:7:"keyword";s:36:"diminished responsibility criticisms";s:5:"links";s:879:"<a href="https://api.duassis.com/storage/q8q7nfc/topic-sentence-about-society">Topic Sentence About Society</a>,
<a href="https://api.duassis.com/storage/q8q7nfc/overnight-horseback-riding-trips-alberta">Overnight Horseback Riding Trips Alberta</a>,
<a href="https://api.duassis.com/storage/q8q7nfc/elemental-knives-canada">Elemental Knives Canada</a>,
<a href="https://api.duassis.com/storage/q8q7nfc/matching-upper-and-lowercase-letters-game-printable">Matching Upper And Lowercase Letters Game Printable</a>,
<a href="https://api.duassis.com/storage/q8q7nfc/a-tennis-game-starts-with-one-of-these">A Tennis Game Starts With One Of These</a>,
<a href="https://api.duassis.com/storage/q8q7nfc/rocky-mount-aau-basketball-tournament">Rocky Mount Aau Basketball Tournament</a>,
<a href="https://api.duassis.com/storage/q8q7nfc/disc-golf-grip-pressure">Disc Golf Grip Pressure</a>,
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}
Mini Shell